What You Need To Know About Video Copyright - IdeaRocket
Skip to content
The supreme court copyright and video

What You Need To Know About Video Copyright

For those of us who create or use content, understanding the basics of video copyright is very important. Breach of copyright is not just unfair to the creator of a work, it can also result in legal liability and a waste of effort.

What Is A Copyright?

Just as how patents were developed to give innovators the right to control and profit from their inventions, copyright was created to give authors and other creators of content the right to control and profit from their work.

Copyright is not a single right. It is best thought of as a bundle of rights. These rights can be sold or rented to others with conditions on time, territory, usage, and modification. If you purchase a license for a piece of music for your video, for instance, that license may have limitations on how you can use the video. It may be permissible to use online, but not be cleared for use on broadcast television.

You do not need to do anything to gain a copyright other than create the content. While it is possible to register a work with the copyright office, and that registration can provide proof of authorship, it is not strictly necessary for you to gain and benefit from your rights.

What Does Copyright Not Protect?

As the copyright office itself will tell you, “Copyright does not protect facts, ideas, systems, or methods of operation, although it may protect the way these things are expressed.”

What Can You Do To Protect Against Breach?

At the most basic level, make sure you have usage permission from the people that create your content. At IdeaRocket, our employee/freelancer contracts transfer their rights to us, and we then transfer all our rights to our clients in our standard client contract. Additionally, we sometimes license material for use, such as library music, and we make sure those licenses are appropriate for the video’s usage.

Despite the best of intentions, sometimes mistakes are made. Errors and Omissions (or E&O for short) is a kind of insurance that protects you from legal liability as a result of copyright or trademark breach.

But You Can Use Copyrighted Material If It’s Fair Use, Right?

The complicated answer to this is: sometimes.

What is Fair Use? It is a justification for use of copyright material when it is desirable for the greater interests of our society. This doctrine identifies four factors that should be taken into consideration when adjudicating whether a use of copyrighted material can be defended:

  • Purpose and character of the use. A scholarly and non-commercial citation of a novel, for instance, is more defendable than a movie based on that novel.
  • Nature of the copyrighted work. Something like news value may provide a justification for use of a copyrighted work.
  • Amount and substantiality. If you use a bar of music, say, that’s more defendable than reproducing 95 percent of the work.
  • Effect upon work’s value. This has sometimes been considered the most important consideration. If the breach should hurt the rights-holder because it becomes a substitute for the original, then that will be judged as more serious than say a parody, that might actually increase the original’s renown and marketability.

This all gets very complicated in case law, and as our lawyer Ivan Saperstein observes in this post, if you’re sued, you’ve already lost, so it’s best to be cautious.

What Are Moral Rights?

In some jurisdictions, creators are said to have certain moral rights protecting their work’s integrity and attribution, that are separate from copyright. Most copyright transfer contracts include a waiver of these rights, so it’s mainly a non-issue these days.

What Is Creative Commons?

Creative Commons is an organization dedicated to sharing and reusing creativity and knowledge. They have created a number of licenses that allow creators to share their material with the public, sometimes with limitations on usage (commercial or non-commercial,) attribution, and modification, but sometimes with no limitations at all.

There are a number of tools available to help you find material that is available for reuse:

Unsplash: Unsplash provides high-quality images that are perfect for use on blogs and websites. The lead image on this post was pulled from Unsplash. There are also a number of other sites offering similar services to Unsplash.

Google: When you are on the Google image search page, click on Tools and you will see a Usage Rights pull-down. You can filter your search according to four license options.

Wikimedia: Wikimedia Commons allows you to search image, sound, and video files that have Creative Commons licenses.

Other platforms: Many other video production platform, such as YouTube, Vimeo, Flickr, and others provide ways for searching for Creative Commons materials, as well as ways of marking your work as available to be shared.

Does copyright protect AI-created material? 

The answer is yes and no. As U.S. law currently stands, content created entirely by artificial intelligence, without meaningful human involvement, is generally not considered copyrightable. Copyright exists to protect human authorship, and that principle still applies.

In most practical cases, however, AI is used as a tool rather than an independent creator. When people are involved in directing, selecting, editing, or shaping AI-generated material, the result is considered a derivative work and is eligible for copyright protection. Clients do not need to be concerned about videos produced by IdeaRocket; we create the work, and it is fully copyrightable under our standard agreements.

There has also been concern that AI will lead to widespread lawsuits from people whose work was used in training these systems. In practice, this is considered unlikely. Copyright protects specific expressions, not ideas or stylistic influence, and AI training does not result in protected works being copied directly into finished videos.

One area where caution is warranted is AI voice cloning. Voice artists have legitimate rights to their aural likeness, and protections are increasingly in place to prevent unauthorized cloning. As a general rule, voice-cloning tools should not be used unless you have clear permission from the artist whose voice is being replicated.

Some clients also ask about access to project or working files, particularly if they want the flexibility to rework or update a video in the future. IdeaRocket retains all production files indefinitely as part of our standard workflow. While ownership of the finished video transfers to the client upon completion and payment, working files are not automatically included. We’re happy to provide them upon request for an additional fee, as preparing, organizing, and transferring large production files requires some extra time and resources. 

As AI introduces new tools and new questions, it does not change the fundamentals of copyright. Human creativity, proper permissions, and clear ownership terms remain the foundation of responsible video production (just as they always have).

While we try to protect our clients for copyright breaches, this is a complicated subject. If you’re in doubt about a matter of the law, it’s best to contact a lawyer for advice.

Receive our
free book
when you sign
up for our
newsletter!